A LONG OVERDUE APOLOGY…3.26.09

by Steve

I learned this morning that the Church of England has issued a formal apology to Charles Darwin. The apology reads, in part: Charles Darwin: 200 years from your birth, the Church of England owes you an apology for misunderstanding you and, by getting our first reaction wrong, encouraging others to misunderstand you still. We try to practice the old virtues of “faith seeking understanding” and hope that makes some amends.

The Church admits that “opposition to evolutionary theories” is still a litmus test in many Christian circles, and that such attitudes often stem from a perceived threat to Christianity. Here’s what I tell my Disciple classes as we begin to study the Genesis accounts (yes, there are more than one) of creation: There are no conflicts between science and the Bible. They do not address the same subjects. The Bible is not a scientific textbook. It was written thousands of years ago by authors who were inspired by God to tell their faith story…how our predecessors understood and interpreted their world, how they made sense of life, how they thought about God.

Science is about observable, demonstrable, verifiable, facts…totally unconcerned with the realm of faith. Science does not care about who God is or what God expects of us. When science proves a fact, as it has done with evolution (evolution has not been a “theory” in a long time), it should never threaten our faith. It should, instead, enhance it, realizing that whatever processes have been and are at work in the universe, those processes were begun and continue under the watchful guidance of the One who hung the stars and laid the earth’s foundation. Rest in that.

2 Responses to “A LONG OVERDUE APOLOGY…3.26.09”

  1. Anyone, in this modern world, who believes that Darwin’s work contradicts Christianity, isn’t paying attention. Any high school biology text demonstrates countless observations of life which all but *demand* a recognition of deity! For all our knowledge, we have but the smallest hint of why a cell divides, much less what controls those divisions, much less how it came to be in the first place. The notion that a cell, today, might begin a journey towards becoming a creature somewhat different than it’s 100,000 year old relative, seems simplistic next to the reality that we are *here*, *now*, to consider it! It is currently estimated that one week’s worth of the New York Times contains more information than an average individual would have encountered *in a lifetime*, a scant four hundred years ago. Imagine what we might know tomorrow. God will still be there, part of us – not stuck in a two thousand year old world-view.

    Bj

  2. As I once heard in a movie, “When science comes to the crest of the last mountain, it will find religion there waiting its arrival.”

Leave a Reply